Home  ›  What Was the Used for Photography, Bombing, Dogfights, and Offensive Attacks

What Was the Used for Photography, Bombing, Dogfights, and Offensive Attacks

Written By Thursday 14 April 2022 Add Comment Edit

Combat betwixt aircraft, conducted at close range

Video showing the F-xv'south maneuverability in dogfighting, firing missile

A dogfight, or dog fight, is an aerial battle between fighter shipping conducted at close range. Dogfighting first occurred in United mexican states in 1913, soon after the invention of the airplane. Until at to the lowest degree 1992, it was a component in every major war, despite beliefs later on Earth War II that increasingly greater speeds and longer-range weapons would make dogfighting obsolete.[i] [2]

Modern terminology for air-to-air gainsay is air combat maneuvering (ACM), which refers to tactical situations requiring the apply of private basic fighter maneuvers (BFM) to assault or evade one or more opponents. This differs from aerial warfare, which deals with the strategy involved in planning and executing various missions.[3]

Etymology [edit]

The term dogfight has been used for centuries to describe a melee: a fierce, fast-paced close quarters boxing between two or more opponents. The term gained popularity during World State of war 2, although its origin in air combat can be traced to the latter years of World War I.[4] One of the beginning written references to the mod-mean solar day usage of the give-and-take was in an business relationship of the decease of Baron von Richthofen in The Graphic in May 1918: 'The Businesswoman joined the mรชlรฉe, which, scattering into groups, adult into what our men call a dog fight'.[v] On March 21, 1918, several British newspapers published an article by Frederic Cutlack, where the give-and-take was used in the modern sense: 'A patrol of vii Australian machines on Saturday met abot 20 of this circus [von Richthofen's] at 12,000 feet. Ten of the enemy dived to set on our men. A regular dog-fight ensued for half a infinitesimal.' [6]

History [edit]

Mexican Revolution [edit]

The offset supposed instance of plane on plane combat and the first example of one plane intercepting some other during an aerial conflict plainly occurred during the Mexican Revolution on Nov 30, 1913, between two American soldiers of fortune fighting for opposing sides, Dean Ivan Lamb and Phil Rader. The story comes from Lamb himself. According to his own statements in an interview two decades afterwards, both men had orders to kill, just neither pilot wanted to harm the other, so they exchanged multiple volleys of pistol fire, intentionally missing before exhausting their supply of armament.[7] [eight] [9] [10] [11]

Globe War I [edit]

An Incident on the Western Front, view of a dogfight involving five aircraft. In the upper foreground a biplane of the Royal Flying Corps flies towards a stricken German biplane, which is falling towards the ground leaving a trail of smoke in its wake (Imperial State of war Museum).

Dogfighting became widespread in World State of war I. Shipping were initially used as mobile observation vehicles, and early pilots gave little idea to aeriform combat. The new aeroplane proved their worth by spotting the hidden German accelerate on Paris in the second calendar month of the war.[12]

Enemy pilots at first only exchanged waves, or shook their fists at each other. Due to weight restrictions, but small weapons could be carried on board. Intrepid pilots decided to interfere with enemy reconnaissance by improvised means, including throwing bricks, grenades and sometimes rope, which they hoped would entangle the enemy airplane's propeller. Pilots chop-chop began firing hand-held guns at enemy planes, such as pistols and carbines. The first aerial dogfight of the war occurred during the Battle of Cer (August fifteen–24, 1914), when Serbian aviator Miodrag Tomiฤ‡ encountered an Austro-Hungarian airplane while performing a reconnaissance mission over Austro-Hungarian positions. The Austro-Hungarian airplane pilot initially waved, and Tomiฤ‡ reciprocated. The Austro-Hungarian airplane pilot so fired at Tomiฤ‡ with his revolver. Tomiฤ‡ managed to escape, and within several weeks, all Serbian and Austro-Hungarian planes were fitted with machine-guns.[thirteen] In Baronial 1914, Staff-Captain Pyotr Nesterov, from Russian federation, became the kickoff airplane pilot to ram his airplane into an enemy spotter shipping. In October 1914, an airplane was shot downwards by a handgun from some other airplane for the start time over Reims, France. In one case machine guns were mounted to the airplane, either on a flexible mounting or higher on the wings of early on biplanes, the era of air gainsay began.

The biggest problem was mounting a motorcar gun onto an aircraft and so that it could exist fired forwards, through the propeller, and aimed by pointing the nose of the aircraft directly at the enemy. French aviator Roland Garros solved this problem by mounting steel deflector wedges to the propeller of a Morane Saulnier monoplane. He achieved three kills, but was forced down due to engine failure down behind enemy lines, and captured before he could destroy his plane by burning information technology. The wreckage was brought to Anthony Fokker, a Dutch designer who congenital aircraft for the Germans. Fokker decided that the wedges were much also risky, and improved the design by connecting the trigger of an MG 08 Maxim machine gun to the timing of the engine.[12] [xiv] The Germans acquired an early air superiority due to the invention of the synchronization gear in 1915, transforming air combat with the Fokker Eastward.I, the first synchronized, forrard-firing fighter aeroplane.[12] [14] On the evening of July 1, 1915, the very outset aeriform date by a fighter aeroplane armed with a synchronized, forrard-firing machine gun occurred simply to the east of Luneville, France. The German Fokker East.I was flown by Lieutenant Kurt Wintgens, earning the victory over a French ii-seat observation monoplane. Later that same month, on July 25, 1915, British Regal Flying Corps (RFC) Major Lanoe Hawker, flying a very early product Bristol Scout C., attacked 3 separate aircraft during a single sortie, shooting down two with a non-synchronizable Lewis gun which was mounted next to his cockpit at an outwards angle to avoid hitting the propeller. He forced the 3rd one down, and was awarded the Victoria Cantankerous.[fourteen]

Battles in the air increased as the technological advantage swung from the British to the Germans, and then back again. The Feldflieger Abteilung observation units of the German air service, in 1914–fifteen, consisted of six two-seat observation aircraft each, with each unit assigned to a particular German Army headquarters location. They had but a single Fokker Eindecker aircraft assigned to each "FFA" unit for general defensive duties, then pilots such equally Max Immelmann and Oswald Boelcke began as alone hunters with each "FFA" unit, shooting unarmed spotter planes and enemy aircraft out of the sky.[12] During the first part of the state of war, there was no established tactical doctrine for air-to-air combat. Oswald Boelcke was the first to analyze the tactics of aerial warfare, resulting in a set up of rules known as the Dicta Boelcke. Many of Boelcke'south concepts, conceived in 1916, are however applicable today, including use of sun and altitude, surprise attack, and turning to run into a threat.

British Brigadier General Hugh Trenchard ordered that all reconnaissance shipping had to be supported past at least three fighters, creating the commencement use of tactical formations in the air. The Germans responded by forming Jastas, large squadrons of fighters solely dedicated to destroying enemy aircraft, under the supervision of Boelcke. Pilots who shot down 5 or more fighters became known as aces. Ane of the most famous dogfights, resulting in the expiry of Major Hawker, is described by the Red Baron, Manfred von Richthofen,

I WAS extremely proud when, one fine twenty-four hours, I was informed that the airman whom I had brought downwards on the twenty- 3rd of November, 1916, was the English language [equivalent of] Immelmann.... First we circled 20 times to the left, and so thirty times to the right. Each tried to get backside and in a higher place the other. Soon I discovered that I was not meeting a beginner. He had non the slightest intention of breaking off the fight. He was traveling in a automobile which turned beautifully. However, my own was better at rising than his, and I succeeded at last in getting to a higher place and beyond my English waltzing partner.... The impertinent fellow was total of cheek and when we had got down to well-nigh 3,000 feet he merrily waved to me as if he would say, "Well, how do you lot exercise?" The circles which nosotros made around 1 another were so narrow that their diameter was probably no more than 250 or 300 feet. I had time to have a skillful look at my opponent.... When he had come down to about three hundred anxiety he tried to escape by flight in a zig-zag course during which, as is well known, it is difficult for an observer to shoot. That was my most favorable moment. I followed him at an altitude of from two hundred and fifty anxiety to one hundred and fifty anxiety, firing all the time. The Englishman could not help falling. But the jamming of my gun nigh robbed me of my success. My opponent fell, shot through the head, i hundred and fifty anxiety behind our line.[fifteen]

Despite the Germans' early lead in combat tactics and their 'Dicta Boelcke', the Allies were quick to adapt and develop their own tactics. The Royal Flying Corps' Albert Ball was one of a band of pilots who liked to fly solo and he adult 'stalking' tactics for going later enemy two-seaters. He fifty-fifty used his Lewis gun in its top wing adjustable Foster mounting to fire upwards into the underside of unsuspecting enemy aircraft. Other RFC pilots such as James McCudden and Mick Mannock emphasised mutual back up and the advantages of attacking from peak. Mannock expressed this in a list of aeriform combat rules that were like to Boelcke'due south.

Memorial erected by German airmen at Sheria, in memory of British and Australian airmen, killed in their lines during 1917

During 1916, aerial reconnaissance patrols had most frequently been unaccompanied every bit there had been little if any aeriform disputes, betwixt the belligerents. However, merely as the Sinai and Palestine Entrada ground war on the Gaza to Beersheba line came to resemble trench warfare on the western front, so too did the air war over southern Palestine come to resemble that being fought over France.[16] Subsequently the 2d Battle of Gaza in April 1917 and during the Stalemate in Southern Palestine which followed, the concentration of Egyptian Expeditionary Force (EEF) and Ottoman Army forces holding established front lines grew, as associated supply dumps and lines of communications were developed. The need to know almost these fuelled "intense rivalry in the air".[17] Aerial reconnaissance patrols were regularly attacked, so information technology was necessary for all photography and artillery observation patrols to be accompanied past escort shipping.[xviii] These special EEF patrols which grew into squadrons, accompanied and protected the reconnaissance aircraft, attacking hostile aircraft wherever they were found, either in the air, or on the ground. However the technically superior German aircraft shot downwards numbers of EEF shipping during domestic dog fights.[17]

By the terminate of the war, the underpowered machines from but ten years prior had been transformed into fairly powerful, swift, and heavily armed fighter planes, and the bones tactics for dogfighting had been laid downwardly.

Spanish Civil War [edit]

Airplane technology apace increased in sophistication afterwards World War I. By 1936, dogfighting was thought to exist a thing of the past, since aircraft were reaching elevation speeds of over 250 miles per hour (400 km/h).[19] The experiences of the Spanish ceremonious war proved this theory was wrong.

At the commencement of the war, new tactics were developed, most notably in the Luftwaffe Condor Legion. Lieutenant Werner Mรถlders brash abandoning the standard "V" formation used in combat, and pairing fighters in twos, starting the exercise of having a wingman at ane's side. He advised that pairs of aircraft approaching a fight should increase the distance between them instead of holding tight formations, a precursor to the combat spread maneuver. He also started the practise of training pilots to wing at night, and with instruments just. Using the new tactics, and flying the newest Bf 109 fighters, the Germans shot downwards 22 Spanish Republican fighters inside a five-day period, suffering no losses of their ain.[20]

Earth War II [edit]

Strategies for fighter development [edit]

During the 1930s 2 different schools of thought about air-to-air combat began to emerge, resulting in two different trends of monoplane fighter development. In Nippon and Italia especially,[ commendation needed ] there continued to be a stiff belief that lightly armed, highly maneuverable single seat fighters would yet play a primary part in air-to-air combat. Aircraft such as the Nakajima Ki-27 and Nakajima Ki-43 and the Mitsubishi A6M Zero in Nippon, and the Fiat G.l and Macchi C.200 in Italy epitomised a generation of monoplanes designed to this concept.

The other stream of thought, which emerged primarily[ citation needed ] in Britain, Germany, the Soviet Union, and the Usa was the belief the high speeds of mod combat shipping and the k-forces imposed by aerial combat meant that dogfighting in the classic WWI sense would be impossible. Fighters such as the Messerschmitt Bf 109, the Supermarine Spitfire, the Yakovlev Yak-1 and the Curtiss P-40 were all designed for high speeds and a adept rate of climb. Adept maneuverability was not a primary objective.

Immediately following the Spanish Civil War came World War II, during which dogfighting was well-nigh prevalent. It was widely believed that strategic bombing lone was synonymous with air power; a fallacy that would not exist fully understood until Vietnam.[21] Afterward the failings in Spain, a greater accent was placed on the accurateness of air-to-basis attacks. The need to stop bombers from reaching their targets, or to protect them on their missions, was the chief purpose for most dogfights of the era.[22]

Dogfighting over Europe [edit]

Dogfighting was very prominent in the skies over Europe. The air force in French republic, while a major force during Earth War I, was inadequate and poorly organized, and quickly fell to the German onslaught. Every bit the first battles betwixt the Germans and the British began, the ability of the German'due south anti-shipping arms became readily apparent, with 88 millimeter shells capable of firing 40,000 feet (12,000 m) in the air. General Wolfram von Richthofen noted that these guns were equally subversive when used for ground burn. Adolph Malan compiled a listing of aerial combat rules that were widely taught to RAF pilots. The High german Bf 109 and the British Spitfire were some of the most common fighters used in the European theater.[23]

A typical dogfight is described past an unnamed pilot,

Pulling up into his blind spot I watched his plane grow larger and larger in my sight. But this German pilot was non content to wing straight and level. Earlier I could open fire his airplane slewed to the right, and seeing me on his tail, he jerked back on the stick into the only defensive maneuver his plane could make. I banked my 47 over to the right and pulled back on the stick, striving to get him over again into my ring sight. The violent maneuver applied terrific Yard'south to my torso, and I started to black out equally the blood rushed from my caput. Fighting every second to overcome this black most me, I pulled back on the stick, further and further, then that the enemy would just show at the bottom of my band sight to allow for the right deflection.

We were both flying in a tight circle. Just a footling more and I'll have him. Pressing the [trigger] I waited expectantly for the 109 to explode. I've hit his wing. A section two-feet long broke loose from the right wing as the auto gun cutting like a machete through it. Too depression, a trivial more rudder and the bullets will find his cockpit. I could come across occasional strikes farther up the wing, merely information technology was too belatedly. The 109, sensing that I was inside him on the turn, slunk into a nearby cloud. Straightening my plane, I climbed over the meridian of the bank, and poised on the other side, waiting for him to announced. Only the 109 did not appear, and not wishing to tempt the gods of fate farther, I pushed my stick forward, entered the protective cover of the clouds, and headed domicile.[24]

Soviet fighters [edit]

During this time, three new Russian fighters, the LaGG-ane, the Yak-1, and the MiG-3 were just coming off of the production line. The Soviet Air Defense Force had been fraught with issues since Globe State of war I.[25] The High german Barbarossa offensive on June 22, 1941, destroyed more 2000 Soviet aircraft on the first day, and more than 5000 earlier October. With bully agony, the Soviets fought in dogfights over Leningrad, Moscow, and the Ukraine for more than a year.

Fireteam, a triple of aircraft ("troika"), has been the main tactical unit used in battles since the beginning of World War II. The analysis and synthesis of fighting experience resulted in a conclusion that group tactics should have been rejected and replaced by action pairs.[26] [27] Even so, ramming an opponent was still a common practice amid the pilots of the Soviet Union.[25] Another successful maneuver was a "Sokolinnyi udar" (falcon punch) when a airplane pilot obtained a speed advantage by swooping down on an opponent, characteristically from the direction of the sun in order to hide their fighter within the glare of the brilliant light before and during the assail. This maneuver and many other tactical principles were introduced by Alexander Pokryshkin, one of the greatest tacticians of the Soviet Air Force who showed his worth during Earth War II. His famous motto sounded equally "Summit, speed, maneuver, burn down!". It became popular in the air armies and was adopted by pilots.[28]

Struggling with morale problems, the Soviets slowly and methodically began to regain air supremacy later on the Battle of Stalingrad in 1943.[29] This theater is notable for including the only female fighter aces in history, Yekaterina Budanova and Lydia Litvyak.

U.s. and Japan [edit]

Subsequently the bombing of Pearl Harbor, in the Hawaiian Islands, the U.s.a. entered the war. The Japanese used the Mitsubishi A6M Nothing, an extremely lightweight fighter known for its exceptional range and maneuverability.[30] The U.S. military tested out the Akutan Zip, a Mitsubishi A6M2 which was captured intact in 1942, advising – along the same lines that General Claire Chennault, commander of the Kunming-based Flying Tigers had already advised his pilots over a twelvemonth earlier – "Never attempt to dogfight a Zero."[31] Fifty-fifty though its engine was rather low in power, the Goose egg had very depression wing loading characteristics, a small turn radius, a tiptop speed over 330 mph (530 km/h), and could climb better than whatever fighter used by the U.S. at that time, although it was poorly armored compared to U.S. aircraft.

A pilot who realized that new tactics had to be devised was Lieutenant Commander John S. "Jimmy" Thach, commander of Fighting 3 in San Diego. He read the early on reports coming out of Red china and wrestled with the problem of his Grumman F4F Wildcats being relatively slower and much less maneuverable than the Japanese planes. Using matchsticks on his kitchen table, he devised a defensive maneuver he called "axle defense position", but commonly chosen the "Thach Weave". Thach reasoned that, because the Zero had cloth wing-covers that tended to "balloon" at speeds above 295 mph, which made the airplane very hard to plough, he could use high speed and a formation of 4 planes, consisting of two pairs of aircraft, flying line-beside (adjacent at the same altitude). Keeping the leader of each pair in close formation with their wingman, the pairs could fly virtually 200 feet (61 one thousand) autonomously (the turn radius of the Wildcat) and adopt a weaving formation when either or both pairs fell nether attack past Japanese fighters, allowing each pair to evade the attack while at the same fourth dimension covering the other pair. Thach fabricated a diagram of the idea and showed it to other pilots, but in trial-runs people similar Butch O'Hare found it difficult to make the shot while, at the same time, evading the 2 friendly planes coming at him head on.[32]

Thach later faced the A6M Zero during the Battle of Midway, in June 1942, for the exam of his theory. Although outnumbered, he plant that a Zippo would lock onto the tail of one of the fighters. In response, the two planes would turn toward each other, with one plane'due south path crossing in front of the other. More importantly, the pursuer would have to follow that path to maintain pursuit, too crossing in forepart of the American plane'southward sights. Thus, when the Zero followed its original target through the turn it would come into a position to be fired on by the target'southward wingman, and the predator would become the prey. His tactic proved to be effective and was soon adopted by other squadrons. The Thach Weave helped make up for the inferiority of the U.s.a. planes in maneuverability and numbers, until new aircraft could be brought into service. This tactic later morphed into the more fluid and versatile "loose-deuce maneuvering" that was to prove useful in the Vietnam war.[33]

Some other effective maneuver used by the U.S. pilots was a simple break, which consisted of turning sharply across an assaulter's flight path, which worked well in role because the large nose of the Zero tended to obstruct the pilot's view.[xxx] Still some other good tactic was a high-side guns pass, which consisted of diving upon the Zero, shooting in one high-speed pass, and using the speed to climb back in a higher place the fight to dive once again.[34] By 1943 the U.S. began to produce planes that were better matched confronting the Japanese planes, such equally the Grumman F6F Hellcat, and the Vought F4U Corsair.[35]

Engineering [edit]

Technology advanced extremely fast during World State of war II in ways that would change dogfighting forever. Jet propulsion had been demonstrated long earlier the war, by German language engineer Hans von Ohain in 1934, and past British engineer Frank Whittle in 1937. The Messerschmitt Me 262 was the kickoff jet fighter to be used in battle, with a speed over 500 mph (800 km/h), and began taking a toll on Allied bombing missions in 1944. The British were testing a jet that aforementioned year, the Gloster Shooting star, which would subsequently come across action in the Korean War. Although U.S. General Hap Arnold test flew the XP-59A in 1942, the plane was never used in gainsay. Other prime inventions of the era include radar and air-to-air missiles.[36]

Propaganda [edit]

Enemy pilots were construed as weak and evil. For example, in World War II, describing the Soviet tactics, the Luftwaffe claimed that, "The characteristic feature of the boilerplate Soviet fighter airplane pilot were a tendency toward caution and reluctance instead of toughness and stamina, brute strength instead of 18-carat combat efficiency, abysmal hatred instead of fairness and chivalry...."[25]

Korean State of war [edit]

Gun camera photo of a MiG-xv being attacked by U.S. Air Force F-86 Sabre over Korea in either 1952 or 1953. The Sabre is piloted by Capt. Manuel "Pete" Fernandez of the 334th Fighter-Interceptor Squadron, 4th Fighter-Interceptor Fly.

Afterward World War II, the question began to rise near the future usefulness of fighter aircraft. This was especially true for the U.S., where the focus was placed on small, fast, long-range bombers capable of delivering atomic bombs.[37] The Korean War began in June 1950, and the North Koreans were outmatched by the U.South. Air Force. The war was nearly over past October, with the occupation of Northward Korea when, on November 1, Chinese MiG-15s attacked. The Chinese began supplying Northward Korea with troops and provisions, and the war quickly resumed.

At 100 mph (160 km/h) faster, the MiG-15 was more than a lucifer for the U.Due south. P-lxxx Falling star, using the aforementioned dive and shoot tactic that the Americans found and so useful against Japan. The U.S. jets had junior weaponry, and suffered from bug with production and parts. The U.South. resorted to using mainly the more maneuverable propeller driven fighters during the war, such every bit the P-51 Mustang which was carried over from World War 2.[38]

To gainsay the MiGs, the F-86 Sabre was put into production. The U.S. pilots had a number of major advantages over the Chinese, including the 1000-suit. Chinese fighters were frequently seen spinning off out of control during a hard turn because the pilot had lost consciousness. Other technological advantages included the radar-ranging gunsight and hydraulic controls. Colonel Harrison R. Thyng remarked:

Suddenly you go into a steep turn. Your mach drops off. The MiG turns with you, and y'all let him gradually pitter-patter up and outturn yous. At the critical moment you reverse your turn. The hydraulic controls [of the F-86] piece of work beautifully. The MiG cannot turn equally readily every bit you lot and is slung out to the side. When you popular your speedbrakes, the MiG flashes by you. Quickly closing the brakes, you slide onto his tail and hammer him with your "50s".[39]

The Chinese were very competent in a dogfight, and large swirling battles were fought in the skies over Korea.[twoscore] Yet, it was highly suspected by many U.S. pilots that some of the opponents they faced over Korea were in fact well-trained Soviet pilots, whom the Americans referred to as "hanchos", (a Japanese word, meaning "bosses").[41] [42] Major Robinson Risner recalls,

Seeing 1 some other about the same time, the MiG flying and my flying dropped [our actress fuel] tanks.. He was and then depression he was throwing up small rocks. I dropped down to get him, just to hit him I had to get down in his jet wash. He'd chop the throttle and throw out his speed brakes. I would coast up beside him, wingtip to wingtip. When it looked like I was going to overshoot him, I would roll over the top and come up downwardly on the other side of him. When I did, he'd get into a hard turn, pulling all the Gs he could. This guy was one fantastic pilot.[43]

The war in the air, however, eventually came to a stalemate as fighting ceased between the 2 factions. Subsequently after the fall of the Soviet Spousal relationship, Soviet records showed that Russian pilots were indeed in the air. Some at times in the fury of combat reverted to the Russian language over the radio.

Vietnam War [edit]

The Vietnam State of war "was the kickoff 'modern' air war"[44] in which air-to-air missiles were the main weapons during aerial combat, and was the only confrontation betwixt the latest aeriform and ground defence technologies between the Soviet Wedlock and the Us.[45] If U.Southward. air ability could successfully carry war against Soviet doctrine and equipment in the skies over N Vietnam, then it could expect to successfully operate against the Soviet Union during a massive war in Europe.[45] Over the skies of N Vietnam, U.South. aircraft would be attacking the "most formidable and most heavily dedicated targets in the history of aerial warfare".[46]

By this time, dogfighting techniques had fallen out of favor in U.S. grooming doctrines, equally missiles were considered to be all that was necessary to shoot downwards the big bombers expected to be deployed by the Soviet Marriage. As a event, air gainsay methods known by fighter pilots since Earth War I became all but lost equally veterans from WWII and Korea retired and didn't pass them on to succeeding generations. American fighter pilots would meet in the skies in secret to engage in mock combat[ citation needed ] to endeavor to maintain some level of proficiency. It wasn't until TOPGUN was established for the Navy in 1969 and Ruby-red Flag was started for the Air Forcefulness in 1975 that pilots were formally trained in dogfighting again.

Both U.S. and Soviet-built jet "fighters" were primarily designed as interceptors: intercepting bomber groups, and then shooting them down with air-to-air missiles. Neither party had a carve up designation for interceptor, though: just F – for fighter; A – for assault; and B – for bomber. (For the NATO shipping) With peradventure a few exceptions, such as the F-8 Crusader and the F-100 Super Sabre, which each mounted four 20 mm cannons, jets were not designed for canis familiaris fighting other jet shipping.[47] Soviet doctrine called for their interceptors to exist strictly vectored towards their targets by Ground Control Intercept (GCI) operators. As a consequence, U.S. RF-101 Voodoo shipping conducting reconnaissance missions, or F-102 Delta Daggers, F-104 Starfighters performing MiGCAP duties, and the strike aircraft themselves, such as F-105 Thunderchiefs, A-4 Skyhawks, A-6 Intruders, F-4 Phantoms and B-52'southward flight over North Vietnam were met by MiG-17s (or Chicom J-5s), MiG-19s (Chicom J-6s), and MiG-21s being vectored directly to them by GCI operators who worked in conjunction with surface-to-air missile (SAM) crews. U.Due south. shipping which successfully fabricated information technology through the NVAF MiGs were so confronted with the SAMs and AAA batteries.

This triad defence force system of GCI-controlled MiGs, Missiles (SAMs), and AAA enabled the Due north Vietnamese MiGs to utilize their aircraft'southward design capabilities as their designers had intended,[48] that of, in the vernacular of the fourth dimension, making "one pass, and and so hauling ass",[49] which was, in practice, apace firing at their targets and so speeding away. By 1967 the Soviets had supplied the NVAF with enough missile-firing MiG-21s to allow the North Vietnamese to routinely engage U.S. aircraft, and to rely less and less on their aged MiG-17s, although many Northward Vietnamese pilots yet preferred the MiG-17s agility and easy maintenance. With the arrival of the additional MiG-21s, and by 1969 MiG-19s (J-6s) imported from Mainland china, engagements between U.S. and NVAF jets became more often than not divided into two arenas; MiG-21s engaged at higher altitudes, while MiG-17s and MiG-19s would try to give battle at lower altitudes where their cannons were more effective.[fifty]

At the conclusion of the air war in 1973, U.Southward. airmen had downed 202 communist MiGs, including two downed past B-52 tail gunners from their quad .50 quotient machine guns; this at a cost of 90 U.S. aircraft to NVAF MiGs.[51] [52] The USAF claimed 137 MiGs while the USN/USMC brought downwardly 65 in air-to-air combat. From these figures, the USAF had 40 gun kills, and the USN claimed eight cannon victories. This number approached parity with the NVAF MiG's 37 gun kill figures.[53] [54]

Approximately 612 radar-guided AIM-seven Sparrow missiles were fired during the war, scoring 56 MiG kills, while 454 heat-seeking AIM-9 Sidewinders were launched achieving 81 aerial victories. During Operation Rolling Thunder 54 AIM-4 Falcon missiles were fired, obtaining v kills.[55] By contrast, NVAF MiG-21s obtained 53 air-to-air kills with their AA-2 "Atoll" missiles, from an unknown number of launchings. At to the lowest degree three MiG-21s, and all of the MiG-17s and MiG-19s (J-6s) made the remaining 37 kills, from their ninety total, with their 23 mm, 30 mm and 37 mm cannons.[56] [57]

As part of the North Vietnamese triad organization of defense force, surface-to-air missiles (SAMs) had become an ever-increasing threat. U.S Air Force Brigadier General Robin Olds describes a typical see with surface-to-air missiles, which during a menstruation of fourth dimension in Vietnam was referred to as either a "MiG day" or a "Sam day", this was a Sam day.[58]

Here come up the SAMs. The trick is seeing the launch. You can see the steam. Information technology goes directly up, turns more than level, so the booster drops off. If it maintains a relatively stable position, information technology's coming correct for you and you're in problem. You're eager to brand a motion simply can't. If you lot dodge too fast it will plough and catch you; if y'all wait also belatedly it will explode near enough to get y'all. What you practice at the correct moment is poke your nose down, get down equally difficult every bit you can, pull maybe 3 negative Gs at 550 knots and once it follows you downwardly, you go up as hard equally you lot tin can. It can't follow that and goes under.[59]

This passage from a USAF booklet explained a MiG day:

"If you know a MiG-21 is in your area or you lose sight of ane and want to find it over again: Roll out wings level for fifteen seconds, then look in your 6 o'clock virtually 1.5 miles. Information technology will be there. Probably you'll encounter mach 2 Atoll (air-to-air missile) smoke trail showtime before y'all come across the MiG. But call up that'southward where the MiG-21 is! Just ask one of the 20 aircrews shot down during Linebacker that never knew they were under attack."[60]

Arab–Israeli conflicts [edit]

The Arab–Israeli conflicts were a series of wars betwixt the country of State of israel and its surrounding Arab neighbors. Those that involved dogfighting occurred between 1948 and 1985. The wars escalated on May xiv, 1948, the twenty-four hours Israel alleged its sovereignty from Britain. The State of war of Independence was followed by the Suez-Sinai State of war in 1956, the Six-Twenty-four hour period State of war in 1967, the War of Compunction, the Yom Kippur War in 1973, and the First Lebanon War in 1982.

The wars began with both sides using propeller planes, such equally Spitfires, Avia S-199s, and P-51s, and so progressed to older jets like MiG-15s, Dassault Mysteres and Dassault Mirages. In the latter wars dogfighting ensued betwixt modernistic aircraft, like F-15s and F-16s against MiG-21s and MiG-25s. Although unremarkably outnumbered, the Israelis managed to defeat the air forces of Egypt, Hashemite kingdom of jordan and Syria in dogfights, often achieving kill ratios ranging from x:1 to over 20:1, which is usually attributed to better preparation of the Israeli pilots and a technological advantage.[61] [62] [63]

Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 [edit]

Pakistani Sabre existence shot down in combat by an Indian Gnat in September 1965 as seen from the Indian aircraft.

The Indo-Pakistani War of 1965 saw the Indian and Pakistani Air Forces engaged in large-scale aerial combat against each other for the first time since the independence of Islamic republic of pakistan in 1947. The state of war took identify during the course of September 1965 and saw both air forces conduct defensive and offensive operations over Indian and Pakistani airspace. The aerial war saw both sides conducting thousands of sorties in a unmarried month.[64] Both sides claimed victory in the air state of war; India claimed to have destroyed 73 enemy aircraft and lost 35 of its own while Pakistan claimed to have destroyed 104 shipping against its own losses of nineteen.[65] The intense fighting resulted in losses by Indian side with Pakistan claiming air superiority. Neutral sources mention India losing 75 and Pakistan lost 20 jets. In the first stage of War, 4 Indian Vampire Fighters were shot down by PAF F-86s on i September, while from Indian side, Indian Sqn. Ldr. Trevor Keeler with his Gnat took the starting time hit on iii September 1965 by downing a Pakistani F-86 which got crashed in an uncontrollable dive. IAF Flt. Lt.V Southward Pathania took the get-go kill past his Gnat on 4 September 1965 by downing the Pakistani F-86 of Flt. Lt Bhatt who escaped to safe territory by parachute. PAF Sqn. Ldr. Muhammad Mahmood Alam, became highest flying ace by five confirmed and 4 probable kills only even so it was afterwards debunked by PAF authors. PAF Sqn. Ldr. Sarfraz Rafiqui who shot downwards iii and Flt. Lt. Yunus were shot down in Halwara, Indian air base of operations past fresh pilots with IAF Hawker Hunter Mk. 56. I Indian Gnat landed in Pakistan airbase accidentally due low on fuel and disoriented, now exhibited as war trophy in Islamic republic of pakistan Air Force Museum

Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 [edit]

By late 1971, the intensification of the independence movement in erstwhile E Pakistan led to the Bangladesh Liberation State of war between India and Pakistan.[66] On November 22, 1971, ten days earlier the start of a full-scale war, four PAF F-86 Sabre jets attacked Indian and Mukti Bahini positions at Garibpur, near the international edge. Two of the four PAF Sabres were shot downward and one damaged past the IAF's Folland Gnats.[67] On December iii, Bharat formally declared war against Pakistan post-obit massive preemptive strikes past the PAF confronting Indian Air Force installations in Srinagar, Ambala, Sirsa, Halwara and Jodhpur. All the same, the IAF did non suffer significantly because the leadership had predictable such a move and precautions were taken.[68] The Indian Air Strength was quick to respond to Pakistani air strikes, following which the PAF carried out more often than not defensive sorties.[69]

Within the first 2 weeks, the IAF had carried out almost 12,000 sorties over East Pakistan and as well provided shut air support to the advancing Indian Army.[70] IAF also assisted the Indian Navy in its operations against the Pakistani Navy and Maritime Security Agency in the Bay of Bengal and Arabian Body of water. On the western front, the IAF destroyed more than 20 Pakistani tanks,[71] four APCs and a supply train during the Battle of Longewala.[72] The IAF undertook strategic bombing of Due west Pakistan by conveying out raids on oil installations in Karachi, the Mangla Dam and a gas plant in Sindh.[73] A like strategy was likewise deployed in East Islamic republic of pakistan, and, every bit the IAF accomplished complete air superiority on the eastern front, the ordnance factories, runways, and other vital areas of East Pakistan were severely damaged.[74] By the time the Pakistani forces surrendered, the IAF had destroyed 94 PAF shipping.[75] The IAF was able to comport a wide range of missions – troop support; air combat; deep penetration strikes; para-dropping behind enemy lines; feints to draw enemy fighters away from the bodily target; bombing; and reconnaissance. In contrast, the Pakistan Air Force, which was solely focused on air combat, was blown out of the subcontinent's skies within the showtime calendar week of the war. Those PAF shipping that survived took refuge at Iranian air bases or in concrete bunkers, refusing to offering a fight.[76] Hostilities officially ended at 14:thirty GMT on December 17, after the fall of Dacca on December 15. Republic of india claimed large gains of territory in Due west Pakistan (although pre-war boundaries were recognised after the war), and the independence of Pakistan's Due east wing as People's republic of bangladesh was confirmed. The IAF had flown over xvi,000 sorties[70] on both East and Westward fronts; including sorties by transport aircraft and helicopters.[seventy] while the PAF flew almost 30 and 2,840. More than 80 percent of the IAF's sorties were close-support and interdiction, and according to neutral assessments most 45 IAF aircraft were lost while, Pakistan lost 75 aircraft.[77] Not including whatever F-6s, Mirage IIIs, or the half dozen Jordanian F-104s which failed to return to their donors. But the imbalance in air losses was explained by the IAF'south considerably higher sortie rate, and its emphasis on ground-attack missions. On the ground Pakistan suffered most, with ix,000 killed and 25,000 wounded while India lost iii,000 dead and 12,000 wounded. The loss of armoured vehicles was similarly imbalanced. This represented a major defeat for Pakistan.[78] Towards the end of the war, IAF's transport planes dropped leaflets over Dhaka urging the Pakistani forces to surrender, demoralising Pakistani troops in Eastward Islamic republic of pakistan.[79]

Falklands War [edit]

The Falklands War began on April two, 1982, when Argentine republic invaded the Falkland islands, and then the isle of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands, which were pocket-size disputed dependencies. Because Britain had no military bases nearby and few aircraft carriers, the Argentinians did not look a response from Britain. On Apr 5, the British sent carriers to the Falklands with Sea Harrier 'Jump-jets' on lath. The Harrier was originally designed as a ground-set on aeroplane, and was not equipped for dogfighting, so the shipping had to undergo many modifications and the pilots given actress preparation.[80]

The Argentinians had superior numbers, but their forces mainly consisted of older jets from the 1960s, such every bit Dassault Mirage IIIs and Israeli Daggers. The Argentinians were too handicapped past the long distance from mainland airfields and a lack of refuelling tankers. Neither side was ready for war, simply both prepared all through April as diplomacy failed. The fighting started on May 1, and was to become the largest naval and air conflict since Earth War Ii. By the end of the war, Argentina lost 20 fighters in dogfights, while Great britain lost 2 Sea Harrier to ground burn down. The Americans supplied late model Sidewinder missiles to the British; this and the analysis of French Delusion combat tactics made the departure.[fourscore] As of March 2019 David Morgan was the terminal British pilot to have fought a dogfight when he downed 2 Argentinian jets on June 8, 1982.[81]

Iran–Iraq State of war and helicopter dogfight [edit]

In the Iran–Republic of iraq State of war of 1980–1988, many dogfights occurred between the Iranian Air Force and Saddam Hussein'southward Iraqi Air Strength. During the early years of the war, the IRIAF enjoyed air superiority (see for instance Functioning Sultan ten and Performance Morvarid); still, by the end of the state of war, the Iranian Air Force had lost its superiority due to their increasingly outdated equipment and the lack of spare parts for their US-fabricated shipping. Iraq, meanwhile, continued to introduce new French and Soviet weapons into its air forcefulness.

The Islamic republic of iran–Iraq War also saw the worlds only confirmed helicopter dogfights, with Iranian Ground forces Aviation's AH-1J Internationals (unremarkably the TOW-capable ones) inbound combat mostly against Iraqi Army Air Corps' Mil Mi-24 Hind gunships and HOT-armed Aรฉrospatiale Gazelles. The Hinds proved faster and more than robust, while the AH-1Js were more agile. The results of the skirmishes are disputed. There were too engagements betwixt Iranian AH-1Js and Iraqi fixed-wing aircraft: using their 20 mm cannon, the AH-1Js scored iii confirmed kills against MiG-21s, claimed an Su-20, and shared in the devastation of a MiG-23.[82]

Persian Gulf War [edit]

In the Gulf War of 1990–91, dogfighting one time again proved its usefulness when the Coalition Air Force had to face off against the Iraqi Air Force, which at the fourth dimension was the fifth largest in the world. By the second solar day of the war, the Coalition achieved air superiority. Many dogfights occurred during the short disharmonize, often involving many planes. Past the finish of Jan, 1991, the term "furball" became a popular word to describe the hectic situation of many dogfights, occurring at the same time inside the same relatively small airspace.[83] By the stop of the state of war, the U.S. claimed 39 Iraqi aircraft in air-to-air victories[84] to the loss of but one F/A-xviii.[85] Of the 39 victories, 36 were taken by F-15 Eagles.[84]

Balkans conflict [edit]

During the Balkans conflict, in 1999 (the Kosovo War), five MiG-29s of the Yugoslav Air Force were shot down in dogfights with NATO shipping. The kickoff was on March 24, past a Dutch F-16AM Falcon, and ii were downed on the same night past U.Southward. F-15s. A day later two more than MiG-29's were shot down by an F-sixteen and F-fifteen.[86] [87]

Eritrean–Ethiopian War (1998-2000) [edit]

The state of war became the kickoff to see quaternary-generation jet fighters battle with each other. Most of the losses to Eritrean MIG-29s were caused by dogfights with Ethiopian Su-27s.[88]

2019 Indo-Pakistan aerial skirmish [edit]

A dogfight betwixt India and Pakistan took identify on 27 February 2019, when Pakistani aircraft including Mirage Vs, JF-17 Thunders and F-16s tried to enter Indian airspace to retaliate against the Balakot Airstrike, which was carried out by the IAF on 26 February 2019.

In the ensuing dogfight, an Indian MiG-21 Bison was shot down by a Pakistani F-sixteen Fighting Falcon after chasing it across the Line of Command.[89] Indian Air Strength officials displayed metal fragments of the AMRAAM missile fired past the F-16, with which the Pakistani regime claimed an Indian Sukhoi Su-xxx had been shot down, but failed to provide whatever proof for the claim.[90]

2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine [edit]

The Russo-Ukrainian War became in 2022 the first conflict in two decades to feature large-scale aerial warfare, including dogfights.

Meet besides [edit]

  • Aerobatic maneuver
  • Battle of Britain
  • John Boyd (armed services strategist)
  • Erich Hartmann
  • Immelmann turn
  • J-Catch
  • List of aircraft shootdowns
  • Lufbery circle
  • Mail service–World War 2 air-to-air combat losses
  • Divide South
  • The Scissors
  • Whifferdill turn

Footnotes [edit]

  1. ^ Su-37 Flanker Report from Farnborough '96[91]

References [edit]

  1. ^ Hallion, Richard P. (1992). Tempest Over Iraq: Air Power and the Gulf War. Smithsonian Institution Printing. pp. 1–10.
  2. ^ Roblin, Sebastien (December 11, 2018). "The F-22 and F-35 Will Be Obsolete: What Will a Sixth-Generation Fighter Wait Like?". The National Involvement. Archived from the original on Dec 16, 2018. Retrieved Dec xvi, 2018.
  3. ^ Robert Shaw, Fighter Combat: Tactics and Maneuvering, pp. 11, xii
  4. ^ Paul Dickson (2014). War Slang: American Fighting Words & Phrases Since the Civil War, Third Edition. Courier Corporation. p. 55. ISBN978-0-486-79716-viii. Archived from the original on 2021-01-26. Retrieved 2020-xi-26 .
  5. ^ "When was the Carmine Baron?". airminded.org. Archived from the original on 2019-05-12. Retrieved 2019-05-12 .
  6. ^ "Crevice Anzac Airmen", Daily Tape, 21 March 1918.
  7. ^ Ragsdale, Kenneth Baxter (1984). Wings over the Mexican Border: Pioneer Military Aviation in the Big Bend. Academy of Texas Press. ISBN978-0292790254. Archived from the original on 25 Jan 2022. Retrieved 24 September 2017.
  8. ^ "The Start Dogfight? ‹ HistoricWings.com : A Mag for Aviators, Pilots and Adventurers". historicwings.com. Archived from the original on 2017-12-05. Retrieved 2014-09-18 .
  9. ^ "The Sunday Morning time Star". Archived from the original on 2021-01-25. Retrieved 2020-09-23 – via Google News Archive Search.
  10. ^ "This Week in USAF and PACAF History" (PDF). OPR: PACAF/HO. 24–30 November 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-01-21. Retrieved 2012-08-27 .
  11. ^ Reichhardt, Tony (4 October 2014). "The First Aerial Gainsay Victory". Air & Space Mag. Archived from the original on 10 August 2020. Retrieved half dozen July 2018.
  12. ^ a b c d "NOVA – Transcripts – Who Killed the Red Baron?". pbs.org. Archived from the original on 2019-02-27. Retrieved 2017-08-26 .
  13. ^ Glenny, Misha (2012). The Balkans: 1804–2012. London: Granta Books. ISBN978-i-77089-273-6.
  14. ^ a b c Not Panicking Ltd (12 Jan 2012). "h2g2 – Early Air-to-Air Gainsay – Edited Entry". bbc.co.great britain. Archived from the original on 26 May 2009. Retrieved 20 December 2019.
  15. ^ "The Red Fighter Pilot". richthofen.com. Archived from the original on 2009-04-02. Retrieved 2009-03-31 .
  16. ^ Cutlack 1941 p. 65
  17. ^ a b Cutlack 1941 pp. 64–65
  18. ^ Cutlack 1941 p. 71
  19. ^ Richard P. Hallion, Storm Over Iraq: Air Power and the Gulf War – Smithsonian Institution Printing 1992. p. 8
  20. ^ Stephen Budiansky, Air Power – Viking Penguin Books 2004, pp. 213–214
  21. ^ Richard P. Hallion, Storm llOver Iraq: Air Ability and the Gulf State of war – Smithsonian Institution Press, 1992, pp. 12–17
  22. ^ Richard P. Hallion, Storm Over Iraq: Air Ability and the Gulf War – Smithsonian Institution Press 1992, pp. 8–thirteen
  23. ^ Stephen Budiansky, Air Ability – Viking Penguin Books 2004, pp. 219–235
  24. ^ Robert Shaw, Fighter Combat: Tactics and Maneuvering, pp. 19–xx
  25. ^ a b c Air Vice Marshal R. A. Stonemason and John W. R. Taylor, Aircraft, Strategy and Operations of the Soviet Air Force, Jane's Publishing Co Ltd., p. 26
  26. ^ Kalinin A.P. (1963). ะ˜ัั‚ั€ะตะฑะธั‚ะตะปะธ ะฝะฐะด "ะ“ะพะปัƒะฑะพะน ะปะธะฝะธะตะน". Moscow, Voenizdat. Archived from the original on 2017-11-09. Retrieved 2013-03-xviii .
  27. ^ Suhov Thou.V. (1983). ะญัะบะฐะดั€ะธะปัŒั ะฒะตะดั‘ั‚ ะฑะพะน. Moscow, DOSAAF. Archived from the original on 2017-eleven-23. Retrieved 2013-03-xviii .
  28. ^ "junebarbarossa.com". Archived from the original on 2012-07-15.
  29. ^ Air Vice Align R. A. Stonemason and John W. R. Taylor, Aircraft, Strategy and Operations of the Soviet Air Force, Jane'south Publishing Co Ltd., p. 28
  30. ^ a b "Dogfight Over Guadalcanal". PBS – Secrets of the Dead. iii June 2009. Archived from the original on 2013-06-17. Retrieved 2017-08-26 .
  31. ^ Edwards Park, Fighter: The World's Greatest Aces and Their Planes - Thomasson-Grant Inc. 1990, p.144
  32. ^ Steve Ewing, Thach Weave, Naval Constitute Press 2004. p. 26
  33. ^ "Thach weave – air formation". britannica.com. Archived from the original on 2018-08-04. Retrieved 2018-08-03 .
  34. ^ Edwards Park, Fighter: The World'due south Greatest Aces and Their Planes – Thomasson-Grant Inc. 1990, p.136
  35. ^ Stephen Budiansky, Air Power, Viking Penguin Books 2004, p. 275
  36. ^ Edwards Park, Fighter: The World's Greatest Aces and Their Planes - Thomasson-Grant Inc. 1990, pp. 155–160
  37. ^ Richard P. Hallion, Storm Over Iraq: Air Power and the Gulf State of war – Smithsonian Institution Printing 1992, pp. thirteen–fifteen
  38. ^ Bill Yenne, History of the U.S. Air Force, Bison Volume Corp., 1984, pp. 46–51
  39. ^ Robert Shaw, Fighter Combat: Tactics and Maneuvering, Naval Institute Press 1985, p. 19
  40. ^ Bryce Walker, Fighter Jets, Time Life Books 1983, pp. 46–64
  41. ^ Zaloga, Steven J. "The Russians in MiG Alley: The nationality of the "hancho" pilots is no longer a mystery. The Soviets at present admit their part in the Korean War" Air Forcefulness Magazine, volume 74, issue two, Feb 1991
  42. ^ "Nova – Missing in MiG Aisle". pbs.org. Archived from the original on 2017-08-30. Retrieved 2017-08-26 .
  43. ^ Bryce Walker, Fighter Jets, Time Life Books 1983, p. 64
  44. ^ Michel III p. two
  45. ^ a b Michel III pp. two, 3
  46. ^ McCarthy pp. 22, 145
  47. ^ Michel Three pp. 16, 79, 157
  48. ^ Michel III p. 81
  49. ^ Michel Three pp. 130, 236
  50. ^ Michel 3 p. 59
  51. ^ McCarthy p. 5
  52. ^ Hobson p. 246
  53. ^ Hobson p. 271
  54. ^ Michel III p. 288
  55. ^ Michel Three p. 156, 286, 287
  56. ^ Hobson 271
  57. ^ Michel 3 p. 159
  58. ^ Michel Iii p. 91
  59. ^ Robert Shaw, Fighter Combat: Tactics and Maneuvering, p. 52
  60. ^ Michel III pp. 239–240
  61. ^ Anthony H. Cordesman, Abraham R. Wagner, The Lessons of Modern War – Westview Printing 1990, p. 86
  62. ^ John Andreas Olsen, Global air ability – Potomac Books 2011, pp. 136–163
  63. ^ Kenneth M. Pollack, Arabs at state of war: military effectiveness, 1948–1991 – University of Nebraska Press 2002
  64. ^ Singh, Jasjit. "The 1965 India-Pakistan War: IAF'south Ground Reality". Archived 2017-07-xix at the Wayback Automobile The Sunday Tribune, 6 May 2007.
  65. ^ Van Creveld, 2012, pp. 286–287.
  66. ^ Sisson & Rose 1991, p. 229
  67. ^ Jagan Pillarisetti. "Boyra Come across – 22nd November 1971". Bharat Rakshak. Archived from the original on 18 Nov 2011. Retrieved nineteen Jan 2012.
  68. ^ "Newsweek : the international newsmagazine: Us edition". Newsweek: 34. 20 December 1971. ISSN 0028-9604. Trying to catch the Indian Air Force napping, Yahya Khan, launched a Pakistani version of Israel's 1967 air blitz in hopes that 1 quick blow would cripple India's far superior air power. Merely Republic of india was alert and Yahya's strategy of scattering his sparse air forcefulness over a dozen air fields failed!
  69. ^ Kainikara 2011, p. 195
  70. ^ a b c "The War of December 1971". Indian Air Force. Archived from the original on 10 Apr 2009. Retrieved 3 May 2009.
  71. ^ "Years later, Longewala reminds the do-or-die battle". The Times of Bharat. No. 18 Dec 2013. India Times. Archived from the original on eighteen Oct 2015. Retrieved 23 August 2015.
  72. ^ Shorey, Anil (Feb 2005). "Battle of Longewala: All-time of Braves". Sainik Samachar. 52 (4). Archived from the original on 18 March 2009. Retrieved 12 April 2009.
  73. ^ Mohan, Jagan. "When lightning strikes". Bharat Rakshak. Archived from the original on 28 February 2009. Retrieved 12 April 2009.
  74. ^ "Bangladesh: Out of War, a Nation Is Born". Time. Time Inc. 20 December 1971. Archived from the original on January 12, 2007. Retrieved 12 April 2011.
  75. ^ Ramunny, Murkot (1997). The Sky was the Limit. Northern Volume Centre. ISBN978-8172110840. Archived from the original on 2022-01-25. Retrieved 2020-xi-26 – via Google Books.
  76. ^ Simha, Rakesh Krishnan (4 June 2015). "Why the Indian Air Force has a high crash charge per unit". Archived from the original on 21 March 2017. Retrieved 16 February 2016.
  77. ^ M. Leonard, Thomas (2006). Encyclopedia of the Developing Earth. Taylor & Francis. p. 806. ISBN978-0415976640. Archived from the original on 2022-01-25. Retrieved 2015-07-thirteen .
  78. ^ Chris Bishop, editor, The Encyclopedia of 20th Century Air Warfare (Bister publishing 1997, republished 2004 pp. 384–387 ISBN 1-904687-26-1)
  79. ^ Choudhury, Ishfaq Ilahi. "Air aspect of the Liberation War 1971". Daily Star. Archived from the original on 22 March 2009. Retrieved 8 April 2009.
  80. ^ a b Ivan Rendall, Rolling Thunder: Jet Combat from World War II to the Gulf State of war. The Free Press 1997 pp. 245–269
  81. ^ Nicholls, Dominic (2019-03-fifteen). "Peace mission: Last British pilot to shoot downwards enemy in combat meets son of Argentinian he killed". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on 2022-01-12. Retrieved 2019-08-28 .
  82. ^ Williams, Anthony Chiliad.; Gustin, Emmanuel (2004). Flying Guns of the Modern Era. Marlborough: Crowood Press. p. 172. ISBN978-1861266552.
  83. ^ William Safire, Safire's Political Dictionary. Oxford University Press, 2008, p. 270
  84. ^ a b "Air Power:The Gulf State of war". Archived from the original on 2012-02-15.
  85. ^ "Air-to-Air Victories in Desert Tempest". 2009-06-04. Archived from the original on 2009-06-04. Retrieved 2021-11-21 .
  86. ^ "MiG-29". ejection-history.org.great britain. Archived from the original on 2007-x-17.
  87. ^ "Balkans Conflict: Yugoslav MiG is shot down in dogfight". thefreelibrary.com. Archived from the original on 2017-12-06. Retrieved 2012-01-25 .
  88. ^ "Air War betwixt Federal democratic republic of ethiopia and Eritrea, 1998-2000 |".
  89. ^ Lalwani, Sameer; Tallo, Emily. "Assay | Did Bharat shoot downwardly a Pakistani F-16 in February? This merely became a big deal". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Archived from the original on 2020-11-30. Retrieved 2021-04-28 .
  90. ^ "Sukhoi Fighter Jet 'Shot Down' past Pakistan Makes Appearance at Indian Air Force Mean solar day Flypast". News 18. 2019-ten-08.
  91. ^ "Fighter Aircraft, Su-37". July 9, 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-07-09.

Farther reading [edit]

  • F. Thou. Cutlack (1941). "The Australian Flying Corps in the Western and Eastern Theatres of War, 1914–1918". Official History of Australia in the War of 1914–1918 Volume VIII (11th ed.). Canberra: Australian War Memorial. Archived from the original on 2012-10-09.
  • Hobson, Chris. Vietnam Air Losses, Us Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps Fixed-Wing Aircraft Losses in Southeast Asia 1961–1973. 2001, Midland Publishing. ISBN one-85780-1156.
  • McCarthy, Donald J. MiG Killers, A Chronology of U.S. Air Victories in Vietnam 1965–1973. 2009, Specialty Press. ISBN 978-1-58007-136-9.
  • Michel 3, Marshall L. Clashes, Aircombat Over Northward Vietnam 1965–1973. 1997, Naval Establish Printing. ISBN 978-ane-59114-519-6.
  • Shaw, Robert L. (1985). Fighter Combat: Tactics and Maneuvering . Annapolis, MD: Naval Establish Press. ISBN0-87021-059-9.

External links [edit]

  • Media related to Aerial combat at Wikimedia Eatables

0 Response to "What Was the Used for Photography, Bombing, Dogfights, and Offensive Attacks"

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel